2006 Napa Cab faceoff:


2006 Napa Cab faceoff:

The one on the right--- Cameron Hughes Lot 146 --- was better, both out of the bottle and 2 days later. Guess which one was cheaper.

Comments

  1. C MerleOctober 19, 2015 at 8:32 PM

    Oh, Napa Cabernet. Not Napa Cabbage. That make sense.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lev OsherovichOctober 19, 2015 at 8:34 PM

    Chris Merle I haven't yet hit the vintage kimchi.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An excellent essay in The New York Times explains how mass market wine is made to suit mass market tastes, often...

An excellent essay in The New York Times explains how mass market wine is made to suit mass market tastes, often with great precision. More than 60 additives can legally be added to wine, and aside from the preservative sulfur dioxide, winemakers aren’t required to disclose any of them. This should have been the ultimate turnoff. Where was the artistry? The mystery? But the more I learned, the more I accepted these unnatural wines as one more way to satisfy drinkers and even create new connoisseurs. For one thing, winemaking has long fused art with science, even if that’s not the story drinkers are told. Ancient Romans doctored their wines with pig’s blood, marble dust, lead and sulfur dioxide. Bordelaise winemakers have been treating their wines with egg whites for centuries. And though the chemicals dosed into wine can sound alarming, some, like tartaric acid, already occur naturally in grapes. The only difference is that today’s winemakers can manage the process with more precision...
Read more

The Wall Street Journal analyzes the wine tastes of kids Millennials and finds then (unsurprisingly) indifferent to...

The Wall Street Journal analyzes the wine tastes of kids Millennials and finds then (unsurprisingly) indifferent to ratings, prestige or familiar brands This poses a challenge to wine markets, who must now spin new and enticing tales about cheap wine from obscure regions. According to Wine Opinions, they spend less money per bottle than their older peers—79% of regular millennial wine drinkers bought wines in the $10-$15 range. (This isn’t all that surprising since most young wine drinkers have less money to spend.) So how and where are millennials getting their wine education? “Millennials don’t like ratings, but they like some kind of review,” said Adam Teeter, the 32-year-old editor and co-founder ofVinePair, a New York-based online wine magazine for millennials. “They have a great thirst for knowledge.” http://www.wsj.com/articles/how-millennials-are-changing-wine-1446748945?alg=y
Read more

A fascinating long read about Renaissance, a cult winery (literally).

A fascinating long read about Renaissance, a cult winery (literally). That is Apollo, the world headquarters of the Fellowship of Friends — legally classified as a religious group, known to many as a doomsday cult. Apollo is the sanctuary where, since 1970, the Fellowship’s members have sought enlightenment through the fine arts: ballet, opera, painting. And wine. Apollo today is eerily quiet and nearly deserted, a remnant of what it once was. Where the Fellowship’s membership once exceeded 2,500, today it has just 585 members worldwide, according to member Grant Ramey. Arguably, in the Fellowship of Friends’ 48 years of existence, the Renaissance Winery has been its most successful venture. At least it was until the Fellowship shut the winery down three years ago. https://www.sfchronicle.com/wine/article/The-lost-civilization-of-California-wine-13174708.php
Read more